SCIENTIFIC DATA

PREDICTALE REOSSEOINTAGRATION

Similar surface to BRANEMARK machined implant      

Surface roughness analisys

Our primary goal in peri implantitis treatment, is to achieve predictable reosseointegration. Surface roughness analysis at the TECHNION INSTITUTE shows, "The surface of an implant treated with the Implant Planer's implantoplasty- is similar to the suface of machined BRANEMARK implant", as such it is ready for reosseointegration. This has been confirmed through surface analysis

IMPACT provides a tool to achieve a PREDICTABLE implantoplasty of the contaminated implant surface for reosseointegration; scientific tests by TECHNION laboratories have confirmed that the surface roughness of the decontaminated implant is similar to the surface of BRANEMARK machined implant.

The machined implant surface has proved for less bacterial adhesion and, as a consequence a,  less possible potential recurrent peri-implantitis 

After 12 monthBefore

HEAT CONTROL

1. Cutting Efficiency with Minimal Heat: The Impact is designed to provide a precise cutting action that effectively removes the outer layer of the implant without generating excessive heat. This ensures minimal thermal effect on the surrounding tissues.

 The IMPLANT PLANER's cutting action during implantoplasty ensures that the maximum heat generated during operation is limited to 35°C. In contrast, traditional dental burs emit heat up to 52°C during their grinding action.

STRANGTH

The Implant Planer employs a controlled implantoplasty action that selectively removes the coil serving as threads, which are responsible for guiding the implant into the bone. This process effectively cleanses the surface of the implant while preserving its mechanical strength.

THE TOXIC EFFECT OF TRADITIONAL IMPLANTOPLASTY

The arrows show toxic TiO₂ Nano particles

In a recent study conducted by Faddy et al. in 2020, it was found that traditional implantoplasty techniques utilizing abrasive burs can generate TiO2 nanoparticles. These nanoparticles were found to possess toxic properties towards the surrounding tissues. Moreover, there is a potential risk of these nanoparticles migrating to other organs in the body, although the full extent of their systemic effects is not yet completely understood. Consequently, the study strongly advises against the use of implantoplasty for peri-implantitis treatment due to the potential health hazards associated with the release of these nanometer-sized particles.

However, the Implant Planer offers a promising solution. Through its controlled implantoplasty action, it effectively removes the contaminated outer layer of the implant while maintaining its mechanical strength. This process ensures thorough decontamination of the implant without compromising its integrity. As a result, the Implant Planer provides a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of peri-implantitis, mitigating the risks associated with traditional implantoplasty techniques.

THESE BURS SHOULD NOT BE USED

As a resut all these burs are elude from use because the risk of toxicit

THE IMPLANT PLANER DEBRIS FORMATION

The IMPLANT PLANER debris on electron microscopeOne remarkable feature of the IMPACT implant planer is its ability to eliminate micro debris. Unlike traditional abrasive burs that can generate nano-sized TiO2 particles, which pose potential risks to both the surrounding tissues and other organs in the body, the IMPACT implant planer avoids the generation of such particulates. This crucial distinction significantly reduces the likelihood of systemic health hazards, underscoring the safety and effectiveness of the IMPACT implant planer as a treatment option for peri-implantitis.

.

The cutting action of the IMPLANT PLANER produce macro size particles